PERILS AND DIVERSIONS OF
RAILWAY TRAVEL.
[By John Pendleton.*]
*All Rights Reserved.
Detectives and Railway Crime.
THE
railway detective is sometimes ridiculously
at fault whether on the track of pickpocket,
luggage thief, stealer of goods in transit, or
perpetrator of more heinous crime; but
notwithstanding his failures, he is a valuable
servant to railway company and travelling public, and
does much useful work. In whatever guise he appears,
he is an amiable person to converse with. Unless you
have some knowledge of his method and resource, you
would scarcely dream that he was a detective at all.
The sleek, white-haired, ruddy-faced man, in broad
cloth, who looks like the valet of an archbishop as he
stands sedately on the platform at crowded station,
certainly does not look like one. Nevertheless he
may have a telegram in his pocket from the chief of
police containing the description of a forger who is
likely be a passenger by the express, and will no
doubt blandly place his hand on the thief's shoulder as
he enters the compartment. The railway traveller,
as he hurriedly laces his boots, and devours his
breakfast, preparatory to his morning race to the city and
to business, seldom gives a thought to the fact that
he may be watched and suspected of some crime by
the quiet, unobtrusive individual against whom he
bangs in his haste to catch the train. But he is;
and though you, being perfectly honest, and free from
vice, have never, except through mistaken identity,
been in his clutches, he has caught many a criminal
and brought him or her to justice.
Murder on the Track.
There have been many piteous assaults on women
in railway trains; and two dreadful murders have, in
the past quarter of a century, accentuated the peril of
railway travel in this country, notwithstanding our
boasted civilisation and the safeguards railway
management has devised for the protection of passengers.
On July 9, 1864, when the night tram from
Fenchurch Street reached Hackney, the compartment of
one of the carriages was flecked with blood, and
contained a hat, walking stick, and hand-bag, but no
passenger. Search being made along the line, a man
was discovered on the track. He was identified as
Thomas Briggs, chief clerk in a Lombard Street
banking house; but no information could be
obtained from him, for he was terribly wounded in
the head and speechless. He died not long after he
was found. His assailants had not taken his money,
but there had been a fierce struggle, for the
passenger's watch-chain had been ripped out of his vest
button-hole, and his watch had gone, as well as his
gold eye-glass which he was accustomed to wear
attached to a hair guard. The bank clerk s watch-chain
had been exchanged for another by a foreigner
named Franz Muller and his barter of this chain
proved an important link in his detection; but the
dramatic incident in the crime was the fact that the
hat left in the railway carriage was not the victim's
hat. It was altogether too small for his head. In
the excitement of the moment Muller had
appropriated the bank clerk's hat instead of putting on his
own, and when questioned as to his whim in wearing
a hat several sizes too large, became disquieted and
fled. He succeeded in crossing the Atlantic from
Liverpool; but was arrested in New York, brought
back to London, tried, and sentenced to death.
Till his feet touched the scaffold he protested his
innocence, then he confessed that was the
murderer, whispering as the hangman adjusted the rope:
"Ja, Ich habe es gethan!" ("Yes, I did it.")
The man who stood out most conspicuously in railway
crime was Thomas Mapleton Lefroy. On June
27th, 1881, he travelled by the express from London
to Brighton, undoubtedly with malice aforethought
to commit murder. He attacked a fellow passenger,
Mr. Gold, a city merchant, with revolver and knife.
Though severely wounded, Mr. Gold struggled
desperately, but finally he was overpowered, and Lefroy,
swinging open the carriage door, flung his body on the
line. Search was made for it, and Mr. Gold's lifeless
form was found in Balcombe Tunnel. His face was
grievously cut and bruised, and his throat was pierced
by a revolver bullet. The guard noticed Mr. Gold
asleep in the carriage at Croydon. At Preston Park
the merchant had disappeared; Lefroy was the only
occupant of the compartment, and his collar was
torn and his look perturbed, as though he had been
engaged in fierce encounter. A bullet was found in
one of the panels, another was discovered embedded
in a cushion, and the carriage was spotted with blood.
Lefroy's denial of his part in the tragedy was
discredited, because Mr. Gold's watch was secreted in
his boot. But he was not arrested at the time. Two
days afterwards the detectives tracked him to Stepney,
and apprehended him in a room, where he was
hiding, with the blinds down. It was at first difficult
to tell whether he was suffering most
keenly from hunger or remorse, but as
the officers pounced upon his false moustache,
whiskers, and blood-stained garments, he
admitted his guilt, saying: "I am glad you have
found me; I am sick of it. I should have given
myself up in a day or two. I have regretted it ever since
I ran away." When taken through Balcome Tunnel,
on his way to Lewes, was a prey to remorse, and
became fearfully excited. At Maidstone Assizes,
where Lord Coleridge, in passing sentence of death,
said the crime reminded him of the story of Hood's
"Haunted House," the prisoner asserted that was
innocent, adding: "The day will come when you will
know that you have murdered me." Nevertheless,
Lefroy was hanged.
Jewel Robbers.
The detective has caught many a bullion thief, and
being as alert as a cat on the railway carriage
front-board, has frustrated attempt at outrage on woman,
and assault on male passenger. He met his match,
however, some years ago on the Midland Railway. A
discharged porter, quite as clever a railway acrobat
as the detective, turned thief, and committed numerous
robberies from running trains. It was his habit
to travel an ordinary passenger. When the train
got well on the swing coolly opened the carriage
window, flung out somebody's portmanteau, and
before they had recovered from their surprise, he
opened the carriage door, and stepped out on the
foot-board. Being accustomed to the difficult feat of
springing on, and alighting from a moving train, he
dropped on the line, severely shaken now and again,
but otherwise uninjured, and making his way back to
the bag or portmanteau he had pitched out,
appropriated everything of value in it. But the wrongdoer,
sooner or later, is overtaken retribution, and
inasmuch as he alighted one night on a very awkward
part of the line, and broke his leg, the detective's task
was, by this accident, made easy, and the gymnastic
porter soon found himself prison.
But it must be confessed that jewel robbery,
either from railway compartment or from railway
station invariably vexes and perplexes the detective.
As rule he has absolutely nothing to base his
inquiry and search upon; and the precious stones,
diamonds, rubies, or pearls, cleverly stolen from my
lady's case, in her own temporary absence, or while
her servant's attention is diverted, may cunningly
reset, and gracing the heads, necks, and arms of
perfectly respectable society beauties before has
obtained any clue to the delinquent. On December 12,
1874, for instance, the Countess of Dudley's jewel
case was placed for a moment on the platform at
Paddington by one of her servants. Opportunity is a
fine thing, and a daring thief took it. He also took
the jewel case, containing tiaras, necklaces, bracelets,
and gems in various settings, to the value of £50,000.
The servant, who had simply been assisting a fellow
domestic from a cab, was nearly mad when the jewel
case could not be found. A reward of £1,OOO was
offered for the thief's discovery; but neither
detective nor informer handled the money. The jewels
are missing yet.
In the more recent robbery of the Countess Dowager
Duchess of Sutherland's jewels, the railway detective
did little towards placing the thief in the dock. A
few months ago her Grace, with her husband, Sir
Albert Rollit, left the Hotel Bristol, Vendome Place,
Paris, for Calais and London. The Duchess placed
her despatch box, containing jewels valued at £30,000,
in a first-class sleeping compartment of the night train
at the Nord Station. Her maid stood the
carriage while her Grace was temporarily absent. No
stranger, to the maid's knowledge, entered. Her
Grace and her husband afterwards took their seats,
and the train started. Soon afterwards the Duchess
missed the jewel case. At Amiens her Grace and Sir
Albert gave notice to the police of the robbery, and
then returned to Paris, where they made known their
loss to the authorities. The detectives were quickly
at work in London, Amsterdam, Calais, Brussels, and
other cities; but they could find no trace of the
missing gems. The thief, in the opinion of some experts,
was a passenger by the corridor train, on which, after
stealing the jewels, he had journeyed to Calais, and
probably made his way to London. A reward of
£4,000 was offered for information, that would lead to
his arrest. Weeks went without any clue. Then
a woman in London told the police that William Johnson,
alias "Harry, the Valet," had stolon the jewels,
and indicating his whereabouts, the man was arrested
by the Scotland Yard detectives. Fashionably dressed
and bedizened with diamonds and rubies, had for
some time led a sort of Monte Cristo life in the West
End. No extravagance was too great for him, and
with the gold he had obtained from traffic in a portion
of the jewels, he had indulged the wildest dissipation.
He was a skilful station platform and train
thief; but inasmuch he was sentenced seven
years' penal servitude, his preying upon travellers has
been checked. But he left the dock with a smile.
Only about £5,000 worth of jewels were recovered.
The bulk of the precious stones are secreted; and the
prisoners smile was eloquent of the fact that when
he is liberated he intends to enjoy the residue of his
plunder.
The Guard's Wealth.
It is the detective's task sometimes bring home
charges of dishonesty to the company's own servants.
One of the most conspicuous cases of this sort occurred
on the London and North-Western Railway. A guard
in care of a train running from Birmingham to London
was suspected of purloining articles from the luggage
in his van. He was watched on several journeys, and
seen to open a number of boxes with ingeniously
constructed
keys. He had a weakness for appropriating
jewellery. He stole brooches, necklaces, bracelets,
rings. When detected he was becoming rich with
ill-gotten gains. He had developed his thieving into
a system. He found the van such a rich gold,
diamond, and ruby mine that he could not dispose of his
finds with sufficient celerity, and concealed them till
a more convenient season beneath the grass and gravel
near his house, or by the line side. Like the servant
in the parable, but with different motive, he hid the
trinkets in the earth.
The Wine Party.
The railway detective occasionally finds himself in
an awkward position. Robberies from goods trains
are frequent, and the officer is now and again puzzled
to discover the delinquents. The general practice is
to bore holes in each end of the truck so that the
detective secreted inside can ascertain at a glance the
approach of any marauder. Ned Farmer, who was
for years a noted railway detective, was one of the
first to make use of these eye-holes. He was an
interesting figure on the line for years among the
privileged few who were cognisant of his occupation. He
was not only a capable detective, but a poet, and
wrote the pathetic rhyme, "Little Jim." He was a
shrewd, practical man, full of resource, and never
permitted his poetic instinct to interfere with his duty.
Ned Farmer was instrumental in transferring many
a felon from railway carriage and the siding into
the police-court dock.
One of the cases in which he was engaged was a
curious one. A goods train was shunted in the
Midlands to let the express pass. Two members of the
detective staff were concealed in bored truck that
formed part of the luggage train. The siding was a
lonely one. There was no habitation near; not a
sign of life. When the express thundered by the
goods driver quitted his engine and assisted by the
signalman went to a truck laden with wine. Broaching
a cask they acted upon the advice given in the old
song. They poured out the Rhine wine; they let it
flow into buckets. The signalman and the brakeman
enjoyed long pulls at the generous liquid. The
driver and stoker took what remained to the
footplate and drank with much gusto. It was a
Bohemian and unsuspicious wine party; the guests
being quite unconscious of the presence of the eager
detectives in the bored truck. They had not even a
whistle warning; not a hint of coming trouble. The
driver was unmolested. He ran the train forward
to its destination. Then the detectives came out of
their hiding-place. There was surprise, consternation,
and indignation; but denial was useless. The
buckets were still rich with the aroma of good wine.
(THE END)