|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,480 (1898-feb-20) p008
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
THE "MACQUEREAUX."
THEIR INFAMOUS PRACTICES.
(SPECIAL TO REYNOLDS'S NEWSPAPER.)
The announcement that Colonel Dalbiac, M.P.,
intends at an early date to introduce a Bill to prevent
the landing, and to give the police power to expel
known foreign criminals residing in this country, has
caused considerable trepidation amongst a section of
the foreign community, who fear that advantage will
be taken of this measure, should it become law, to
surrender to the tender mercies of the despotic
Governments of the Continent political refugees.
On the other hand, it must be
admitted that there is crying necessity for legislation
to cope with the herds of criminal foreigners who
have settled in certain districts of London, which they
have succeeded in transforming into an Alsatia where
every form of vice and blackguardism flourishes.
Lately the papers have contained, with painful
frequency, reports of robberies and outrages perpetrated
in the districts of Soho and the streets in the vicinity
of Waterloo Station regions particularly patronised
by criminal foreigners, These reports have not, to
most people, carried with them the significance that
should properly attach to them. In reality
such outrages are perpetrated by well-organized
gangs of French scoundrels known in French argot as
"macquereaux", or miscreants who are partly bullies
and thieves. It is, indeed, a disgrace to the police of
this metropolis that bands of these ruthless, desperate,
and lawless ruffians should exist and flourish, especially
when it is considered that many of them have been
expelled from the Continent for these very practices.
Until within the last few years the "macquereaux"
were content with extorting money from the
unfortunate women who consorted with them, but lately,
owing to their long immunity, so unlike the methods
pursued by the authorities on the Continent, where
men of this depraved class are hunted down,
imprisoned, and expelled, they have organized themselves
into bands for the purpose of committing outrage and robbery.
It would be impossible to enumerate all the crimes
that have recently been perpetrated by men of this
class. Only the other day the murder of the unfortunate
foreigner Broissette sent a thrill of horror
through the land, and to merely recount the murders
and outrages committed in the Soho and Stamford-street
districts within the past few years would more
than fill a column of this paper.
It should always be remembered that the cases the
public hear about only represent the smallest proportion
of the crimes of those districts. It is easy to find
several houses in streets off Frith-street and
Dean-street, Soho, and Stamford-street which communicate
with each other through traps and doors hidden by wall
paper which are used for nefarious purposes. This, of
course, means that a criminal conspiracy exists among
the occupiers of these houses. A master carpenter
assured the writer that in the last five years he had
constructed sliding doors between thirty-two houses in
Soho. Some of the owners of these houses are Vestrymen
it is well to bear in mind. Without extra powers,
the police admit that they are almost helpless.
Every night each member of the gang takes up his
appointed station; the women are spread abroad as
decoys. Woe betide the unfortunate person who is
inveigled either into the back streets of Soho or South-East
Lambeth by these harpies. Even if he does not enter a
house, he is almost sure to be robbed, providing the street
is fairly quiet. If the victim can be stripped quietly
and without his knowledge, it is usually accomplished.
But if he appears on his guard, or if his assailants
fear resistance it is very different. A favourite dodge is to
engage an intended victim in conversation for a few
moments, and then when a favourable opportunity is
opened clench the two middle fingers of the right hand
and violently thrust the little and forefinger into
his eyes, thereby blinding him for the time being. It is
no uncommon thing for persons to have their eyes
forced out on their cheeks in this manner, and instances
can be given of gentlemen who have thus been blinded
for life!
Pipes are used by the macquereaux also, for
blinding those they wish to rob! These pipes are made
with a small rubber tube, placed underneath the stem,
and terminating at the bowl, containing cayenne
pepper! These pipes are smoked in the usual manner,
but in the event of their owners desiring to do so, they
have only to blow, and their victims eyes are filled
with cayenne pepper!
Another device is to approach and engage in
conversation, and then the robber suddenly seizes his
victim's coat by the shoulders and pulls it down over
his arms, which of course, leaves the person attacked
helpless. He then usually receives a stunning blow or
two on the head and his assailant decamps with his
money and watch.
Such are some of the practices of this dangerous
class and it is indeed high time that legislation was
passed which would render it difficult for these
scoundrels to practise their infamies in this country.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,481 (1898-feb-27) p006
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
In continuation of the "Mysteries" published by
us last week, our special contributor writes that the
streets of Soho are not exceptionally dangerous to
ordinary passengers. In fact, anyone walking through the
intricate end winding ways lying between Oxford-street
and Shaftesbury-avenue would be struck with
the apparent quiet prevailing at all hours of the night.
Should, however, the young man from the country
accept the overtures of the women who haunt the
Leicester-square, Oxford-street, and Piccadilly-circus
districts and accompany them to any of the dens that
abound in this quarter he will return home a sadder
and wiser man, minus watch, purse, and valuables.
Old residents in the district say that it is absolutely
dangerous to enter one of these places.
The police are "powerless," and so are the Vestrymen
for excellent reasons. Some of the police, it is
asserted, follow the same occupation as the gentlemen
from the Continent. It is maintained by those
in a position to know that many constables make
from £5 to £10 weekly out of the blackmail
they levy upon the unfortunate women. The recent
Manchester police scandals hare shown how very
fallible the police can be in this respect. Not that the
police do not enforce the law sometimes. They have
been known to be so zealous that some women have
been arrested three days running, while others have
plied their trade unchecked. Slanderous tongues say
that those women have neglected the customary dues.
The reason why the Vestrymen do not enforce the
law are also obvious. It is alleged that Vestrymen
in these parishes own house property in
which this infamous traffic is carried on. Some
landlords demand a reference. But there is a
man living near Shaftesbury-avenue who makes a
comfortable living by certifying that the macquereaux and
their ladies are perfectly respectable persons. Should
the landlord get into trouble, he can prove that he has
been misled in the innocence of his heart by a forged
reference.
The general conception of these scoundrels is that
they are needy, desperate ruffians. But this is not so.
The macquereaux, so far as dress goes, is quite the
gentleman and might be mistaken for a West-end
swell. Some even realize considerable portable
property by their infamous trade. One man, who owns a
room with sliding doors and is said to have money in
the bank to the amount of several hundred pounds,
employs another man to rob his victims. He will be
comfortably seated in a neighbouring café while the
dupe is stripped by his confederate. Should an arrest
occur, he can easily prove an alibi.
Experience has proved that these infamous scoundrels
are frequently used as agents provocateurs. They
have occasionally penetrated among the foreign refugees,
but they are quickly driven away when their real
occupation is discovered. With these vile wretches in their
pay it would be easy for the police to trump up false
charges against any exile "wanted" by the Continental
police if Colonel
Dalbiac's
Bill became law. Much
more to the purpose it would be if an inquiry were
instituted into this extraordinary supineness of the police
and the local authorities in face of this monstrous evil.
Another matter worthy of note is that if prostitutes
and criminals hare increased, so have the number of
idle rich men. Belgravia and Piccadilly are responsible
for the plague spot of Soho.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,482 (1898-mar-06) p001
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
It is curious to observe how, whenever an East-end
betting club is raided, the police always time their
appearance on the scene when the club is filled with its
patrons, who are promptly hauled off to gaol. But in
the recent raid on the infamous establishment in
Portland-street, the police, although they had it under
observation for months, and brought witnesses to
testify that numerous "gentlemen" visited the house
nightly, made their raid when the house was empty,
and thereby doubtlessly saved many scions of "our old
nobility" from appearing in the dock.
The Home Office, which has the control of the
Metropolitan Police, is making that force more political
every day, and is adopting increasingly the suggestions
and methods of the Continental police forces. It is
believed that political refugees are frequently
kidnapped and taken out of the country with the
connivance of the police, who, it will be remembered, took
no steps until public attention was drawn to the
the scandal by the Press when Dr. Sun Yat Sen
was kidnapped in Portland-place. The late Sergius
Stepniak, it is well known, lived in dread of being
surreptitiously conveyed out of the country, and the
stories that he used to tell of compatriots who,
after making appointments to meet in an hour or so,
had disappeared as though the earth had opened and
swallowed them, in this vast city of London, were
surprising. It is perfectly well know that foreign Governments
maintain emissaries here to watch suspected
persons, and as for kidnapping not being feasible, it
is as easy as possible for a strange foreigner to
meet with a compatriot, be invited to drink, and then
drugged and conveyed on a vessel lying in the Thames
and so deported. As recently as the Greco-Turkish
War inquiries were made concerning a young Turkish
gentleman, who was never seen after going out from
his lodgings one Saturday afternoon. James Stephens,
the Fenian leader, relates that several attempts were
made in the streets of Paris to kidnap him by agents of
the British Government, and seeing that a vast plot
like the Jameson Raid, which had the covert approval
of the Government, was hatched in London, it is
obvious that while the present system prevails any
infamy may be perpetrated.
The procuration and the exportation of young girls
to the State-licensed brothels of the Continent is
largely in the hands of the class of
macequereaux to
whom we referred last week. The fate abroad of a
young woman so deported is horrible. She is a
prisoner in the brothel to which she is sent, for on the
Continent girls of the town are not allowed to ply their
trade in the streets, and she is compelled to accept
the embraces of any man who will pay the mistress of the
house high enough, no matter how repulsive he may
be. The Portland-street case this week is a sample of
what is done in other countries. Twelve years ago a
law was passed punishing the procuration of girls with
severity. Since then the prosecutions under the Act
may be counted on your fingers. Yet the men engaged
in this horrible trade are well known to the police.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,483 (1898-mar-13) p001
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
In London the women-folk of the very rich and the
very poor, as a class, smoke incessantly. "Advanced"
women smoke, not so much because they find pleasure
in it as because they consider it proclaims their
emancipation. Courtezans of all classes smoke for the
reason, as Lombroso explains, that it unconsciously
soothes their nerves. Most "Society" women smoke
and, if the truth must be known, drink also to excess.
West-end picture galleries, fashionable florists, and
massage establishments are places which are extensively used
by Lady Clara Vere de Vere and her friends for this
purpose. It is no uncommon thing for ladies to
request to be left alone in the inner compartments of a
Bond-street gallery for half an hour or so, ostensibly
in order that they may contemplate the beauties of a
picture, but in reality to smoke cigarettes and drink
brandy! The methods by which they conceal spirits
and cigarettes are decidedly ingenious. Parasols are
made with hollow sticks, which contain long glass
tubes which are filled with cognac. The gold knob is
constructed to unscrew and form a flask. Fans
frequently conceal cigarettes in their folds and are
specially constructed for that purpose. Bouquets
would, were they closely inspected, be frequently
found to hide a dainty little bottle of brandy. The
reason for these subterfuges is that no woman in
"Society" could be seen in a public-house without loss
of caste.
In some countries on the Continent ladies smoke
openly, notably in Spain or Russia. A drunken woman
in Spain is, however, a rarity, and, the writer, who
lived five years in Malta and the South of Italy, never
once saw a drunken woman. It was said, however, in
Malta that there was one lady, the wife of a foreign
Consul, who used to drink to excess. Her husband,
who was once questioned by the Duke of Edinburgh,
then Admiral of Mediterranean fleet, as to the reason
why his wife never accompanied him to dinners or
diplomatic parties replied. "Your Royal Highness, she
so much resembles the English ladies that she gets
drunk and lies on the sofa."
No greater contrast can be imagined than the spectacle
of the bejewelled woman of the "upper ten
thousand" toying with a cigarette in a drawing-room
and the hearty relish evinced in her pipe by an old
Irishwoman in her cabin. Nearly all the women who
live in common lodging-houses smoke, not dainty
cigarettes, but shag and twist tobacco. It is quite as
common to see a girl of fifteen in these haunts puffing
away at a pipe that would turn a navvy up as it is to
see a cabman smoking on his box. These women,
however, never smoke in public, although late at night
they frequently accost men end ask them for a bit of
'bacca or a pinch of snuff, a habit they also indulge in.
It is noteworthy that every one of the victims of Jack
the Ripper had pipes in their possession.
At the Democratic Club, when that institution was
flourishing, many of the lady members smoked, chiefly
cigarettes, although there were a few who could tackle
cigars. None of them ventured on a pipe, which
proved that their smoking was merely a pastime, not a habit.
In spite of all that has been urged in favour of
women smoking, the fact remains that the habit is
mostly indulged in by women who have not only cast
aside conventionality but also morality. Drink
generally accompanies tobacco, and the world knows
that it is the nature of women to rush to extremes.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,484 (1898-mar-20) p001
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
The advent of fine weather in London is heralded
by the more or less impudent appeals by papers of the
claptrap character on behalf of nondescript "funds," for
which they petition, not through their own columns,
but by means of placing girls and boys at street
corners to importune passers-by. There are some
journals which obtain large amounts for deserving
purposes in this manner, but the majority of their imitators
simply use for their own purposes the sums dropped
into their collection boxes by pedestrians who imagine
that they are subscribing to the "Penny Blanket
Fund" or the "Seamstresses' Sniff of the Sea Guild."
It certainly looks like "straining at a gnat and
swallowing a camel," for the authorities, who are
supposed to put down mendicity and imposture, to be
winking both eyes at the shameless begging that is
openly indulged in by the proprietors of some of these
rags.
Surely, as it is a punishable offence for a squalid man
or woman to solicit alms, the powers that be should
exert themselves to remove these begging boxes from
the corners of our principal streets? It is high time
that the Charity Organization Society or the Mendicity
Society inquired into the bonâ-fide nature of most of
these "funds."
The general public have no idea of the
rascality practised by some of these bogus journals.
They are usually started by illiterate sharpers and
they depend upon "prizes," which are never paid, for
their circulation. Generally they contrive some scheme
whereby they induce dupes to forward them shillings
for lottery purposes, and are every bit as bad as
"Perfection" Miller. The writer some time ago answered
an advertisement in a daily paper, "Wanted a capable
journalist to act as editor," and secured the appointment.
The office near the Strand was quite
irreproachable as far as appearances went, and the
proprietor, who was as ignorant as a savage, told his
editor he could have a free hand over everything but
the competitions (those he would attend to himself),
and he would pay him £300 a year. At the end
of six weeks the "proprietor" decamped with
upwards of £1000 he had received for a
"result" competition, and the money, a considerable
sum, that had been collected for a "fund."
He impudently forwarded the editor a cheque for his
salary which was dishonoured, paid neither his printer
nor paper maker, and obtained his office furniture on
the hire system. Surely when such adventurers
flourish and start papers, it is high time that the
"funds" they get up should be investigated?
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,488 (1898-apr-17) p004
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO REYNOLDS'S NEWSPAPER.)
The passion for gambling is rapid extending among
women, both of the "upper ten thousand" and the
working class. The poorer women are not able to cloak
their vices as effectually as their wealthy sisters.
Hence we find reported in the daily papers the
conviction of a woman gambler at Battersea and learn that
in factories in the East-end of London and in the
weaving sheds and spinning mills of the industrial
North betting and "bookmaking" is nearly as prevalent
among women as among men of the same class.
Not content with attending racecourses and entrusting
large sums to their male attendants for the
purpose of "backing" horses, there are such large
numbers of women of wealth addicted to gambling that at
the present moment there are at least five "clubs"
which are, in reality, gambling hells, in the neighbourhood
of Kensington and Park-lane. These "clubs"
are, to all outward appearances, gentlemen's mansions.
Inside the scene is, however, very different. Daylight is
excluded from the drawing-rooms by means of heavy
shutters, but the rooms are ablaze with electric light.
In the club our correspondent visited two long tables run
down the centre of the room, around which nearly forty
ladies, some of them in evening dress, bedizened with
jewels, others in plain "walking" costumes, were
seated, playing, some at nap, others at
baccarat
and poker, but the majority at rouge et noir, for
dear life! The keeper of this club is a titled
lady in
"reduced circumstance" and her patrons are all of
the élite of Society. It was painful to witness the
avidity and the recklessness with which they played.
Little sound was heard except the tinkling of gold and
now and then an hysterical cry of triumph or a
stifled sob of loss. The stakes for which these women
play are high. Five shilling "nap," for instance,
was being extensively played and those who are aware
how at halfpenny "nap" a sovereign can be rapidly
lost or won, may form an opinion of the money that
would change hands at this game.
In a lull of the play drinks, including brandy and
whiskey and soda and champagne, were handed round
and consumed greedily. The clay continues till a late
hour. The proprietress of this establishment seemed
to know her guests' arrangements perfectly. Every
now and then she would rise, approach some lady,
and say, "You must be home, dear, you know, by
seven for dinner or the Earl will be anxious," or
"Don't forget your appointment with the Colonel.
You must not make him too suspicious." Time was
when a lady like the Duchess of Montrose (Mr. Manton
as she was called), who was known to openly bet and
own racehorses, was ostracized by "Society." Now-a-days
the vice has become so common that it is not even
regarded as an idiosyncrasy by the aristocracy and the
wealthy. "You would hardly believe it," said one of
the largest advertising "tipsters" recently to the
writer, "that I have nearly as many ladies on my
books, regular customers, as men. It I was to reveal
their names, you would, indeed, be astonished."
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,491 (1898-may-08) p001
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO REYNOLDS'S NEWSPAPER.)
One of the most pernicious callings is that of the
illiterate and ignorant miscreants who boldly announce
that they cure "secret" diseases and dub themselves
either "professors" or place alphabetical appendages
to their names. Their advertisements are familiar
enough in our public lavatories, despite the rewards
offered by Vestries for the conviction of bill-stickers,
and, strangely enough, legal proceedings can only be
taken against the person who actually posts the bill.
As a general rule these "professors" who style
their abodes "medical halls," "temples of health," &c
are entirely ignorant of the healing art. One in a
large way of business who is of German extraction is
unable to read or write! He maintains upwards of
thirty bill distributors daily on an average and on
occasions like great race meetings, frequently
increases his staff to 150 men. The permanents hands
are paid 30s. per week; extra men receive from 3s. 6d.
to 5s. per day, and any fines they may incur are paid.
Should they be so unfortunate as to get a sentence of
imprisonment without the option of fine, under the
Indecent Advertisement Act, they receive a gratuity
amounting to £1 for every seven days they are
incarcerated. Some time ago one of these "professors"
was sentenced at Liverpool to seven years' penal
servitude for blackmail and fraud in connection with this
discreditable calling, and the police stated that his
turnover amounted to £15,000 yearly! This man had
previously been a billposter for a rival quack.
The methods of these rascals are as follows:
Although their victim may be only suffering
from a slight ailment, they proceed to
frighten him by saying that he has contracted
a fearful malady which will probably cause insanity
and death unless a very long and expensive course of
medicine is taken. In most cases the "patient" is
some inexperienced youth who has been "seeing life,"
and he places himself in the hands of the "professor"
whose specious advertisement has inveigled him, and
is bled of every penny and kept unwell for months,
and frequently has his health injured permanently by
the vampire in whom he confides. As a rule the
great dread of patients is that their relatives
should learn of their folly. This fear the
"professors" artfully work upon and thus continue
to extort large sums from them. One young man,
a student at a well-known University, was bled quite
recently of upwards of £400. It will hardly be
credited that these scoundrels actually spread disease
in order that they may make profit by pretending to
cure it! A great many of their patients come from
country places, where the residents feel ashamed to
consult the local doctor, who is usually the friend of
the family. To these resorts the "professors"
despatch women of degraded character with instructions to
mix with the farmers' and well-to-do tradesmen's sons.
In about a fortnight it is necessary for these females
to quit, and then bill distributors and bill posters
come down from London, and the place is deluged with
advertisements. The proprietor of the "medical
hall" reaps a rich harvest and many of the young
men a heritage of sickness and sorrow! We have said
enough to show the necessity for intervention on the
part of the authorities, and the passing of laws which
will effectually prevent the continuance of this infamous
trade.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,492 (1898-may-15) p008
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO REYNOLDS'S NEWSPAPER.)
During the last few years, owing largely to the
strange success of fictional works that have glorified
detectives, an immense number of "private inquiry
agencies," "detective bureaus," &c., have sprung up
in our midst. Some of these are of course of a
bonâ-fide
nature, but the majority are run by unscrupulous
individuals, who combine blackmail with espionage.
Speculators of a shady type find numbers of these
so-called "detective agencies" in employment for
the purpose of finding out the position of
shareholders in joint stock companies. Should they
report that the holder of valuable securities is an
unbusiness-like person a widow or a country parson
unversed in the ways of the world the speculator
contrives, by means of forwarding circulars or by boldly
sending one of the private detectives with a specious
story concerning the forthcoming failure of the
company, to frighten the shareholder into the belief that
the shares are almost valueless. As soon as this is
accomplished an outside stockbroker writes and makes
an offer for the shares, which is almost invariably
accepted, and the duped shareholder is induced to part
with property at considerably loss than its market
value. One person who has been recently the hero of
a great company scandal has acquired several hundred
thousand pounds' worth of shares in this dishonest
fashion.
A common form of advertisement for these "private
inquiry agents" to use is to print on their letter paper
that "Messrs. Ferret and Fox beg to draw their
clients' attention to the fact that all cases in which
they have been employed to collect evidence have
proved successful to their patrons." The reason is
that when evidence is lacking they usually proceed to
manufacture it. That is constantly being shown in
divorce court proceedings. As they are mainly
employed in divorce cases, the amount of
money they receive for "faking" evidence and
committing perjury is incredible. Some time ago an
ex-private detective assured the writer of the truth of
the following incident: A wealthy City magnate's son,
a young fellow just turned twenty, married an actress
who was touring in a minor company. The father, who
was a religious man, was indignant, and cut off the
allowance of the son, who, compelled by threats of
being left destitute, was induced to leave his wife
and go to Australia for twelve months. He also
employed a firm of private detectives to procure
evidence for a divorce. This they agreed to do, and
argued that poverty would be bound to drive her into
sin. For this purpose they, by means of anonymous
letters, &c., succeeded in preventing her from obtaining
employment for some time. Eventually the lady
was offered an engagement in a "fit-up" pantomime
company a company that tours small towns where
there are no regular theatres and performs in town
halls, &c. at 15s. a week, Surely on such a salary she
would soon fall an easy prey to temptation. To
make this doubly sure, the ex-detective was
despatched to the town where the lady was performing,
with instructions to spare no expense to induce her to
live with him as his wife. He had little difficulty in
obtaining an introduction and proceeded to make love
in the approved fashion. The lady, however, had
expensive tastes and before his designs were
accomplished over £300 were spent on presents of
jewellery, &c. Finally the damsel agreed to live with him
as his wife, and in the next town they visited did so.
At last sufficient evidence was procured for a
divorce, the detective was recalled to London, and
in a short time proceedings were inaugurated.
Then a strange thing happened. The detective,
who had deliberately induced a woman to commit
adultery in order to ruin her future life, received a
summons to attend at his employers' office, where he
found the City magnate and the head of the firm, looking
virtuously indignant. "You damned fool!" began
the irate father. "I don't know what you mean, sir,"
said the detective. "Perhaps not, sir perhaps not,"
said the religious gentlemen. "You and your precious
employers have had nearly £1,000 out of me for your
expenses since this divorce business commenced and
dam'me, sir, you've been living with the wrong
woman!"
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2.493 (1898-may-22) p001
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
It seems a strange anomaly that despite the enormous
police protection awarded to the West-end of London
the neighbourhood of Piccadilly-circus and Regent-street
is nightly haunted by professional druggers. The
drugger is of the aristocracy of crime. He is always
well dressed and is frequently a broken-down medical
student or professional man. His haunts are
"fast" West-end bars end places of amusement.
He generally contrives to ingratiate himself into the
society of the elderly men of means who are often found
in these resorts sampling vice on commercial principles.
Men of this type are considered the legitimate prey
both of the druggers and blackmailers, as the chances
are they will never dare the publicity a prosecution
would entail on them, They are generally married,
with families, and regarded as pillars of propriety by
their associates.
The methods of the druggers are to get into conversation
with this type end invite him to have drink. Various
topics are touched upon, and finally the everlasting
theme of "woman" is introduced. "Pooh! you
can see nothing here," the drugger will observe,
gazing contemptuously at the painted, bedizened
women around. "Now, I know a place where you can
see something worth seeing, you know. It's only
half-a-crown's ride in a cab to get there, too." The
curiosity of the victim is aroused, and he agrees to the
proposal. The final drink is ordered. The drugger
contrives while taking the glasses from the barmaid
to empty the contents of a little tube
containing chloral, which he has concealed in the
finger of his glove, into the victim's glass. The drinks
are swallowed, the two enter the hansom, which is
ordered to drive to an address some distance away, and
in a few moments the unsuspecting roué is unconscious!
The drugger at once despoils him of his money and
valuables and then stops the cab, tells the driver that
his friend is "too far gone," to proceed to the address
in question, pays his fare, and directs him to drive his
friend to some well-known hotel.
The victim is probably locked up for being drunk and
incapable, and when he comes to usually prefers to
give a false name. The box attendants at certain
music halls can also tell some strange stories of gentlemen
who have been drugged.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,494 (1898-may-29) p004
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
Almost every boy and girl now-a-days who is
possessed of a little education and a vast number who
are grossly and invincibly ignorant fondly imagine
that they are the possessors of either literary or
histrionic powers. They are, consequently, fired with
the desire either to earn the bread of uncertainty as
authors or actors. Unfortunately, instead of going
for advice to writers or actors of experience, the
overwhelming majority of these youthful aspirants fall
into the hands of some of the bogus literary and
dramatic agents who infest London, are bled of every
penny, and frequently entirely ruined by these specious
knaves. The methods of the bogus theatrical agent
have been frequently described at the police courts, but
there appears to be a perennial crop of fools who
invariably become the prey of knaves.
The bogus agent usually proceeds by taking an
office in the neighbourhood of the Strand, which he
furnishes sumptuously on the hire system, and advertises
extensively for "amateurs of both sexes." The
number of applicants an advertisement of this description
brings in is enormous. A few weeks ago an
advertisement for experienced artists to form a stock
company in the provinces resulted in 1,000 applications.
As soon as the bogus agent receives the letters
of application he writes to them individually to the
effect that he is about to tour some well-known play
and they can have a certain part on payment of
£10 10s. premium. Sometimes he is able to find a
sufficient number of credulous persons to form four or
five companies. When this occurs he has to
make elaborate arrangements in order to prevent
rehearsals from clashing. In a few weeks, after
a rehearsal or two has taken place, the "manager"
announces that they will open at the Theatre Royal,
Slocum-in-the-Mud, and agrees to meet them in that
interesting village. Needless to say the poor dupes
proceed there, only to find the theatre engaged by a
bonâ-fide
company, and of course their bogus manager
never turns up; he has skipped it to Birmingham or
Liverpool, to repeat his operations under another
name. The lot of the duped "amateurs" is, as a rule,
an unhappy one. They lose their faith in agents and
usually return to London and pester managers for small
parts, which they may succeed in obtaining if
they have means. It is even said that in some
well-known theatres the minor rôles are played
by persons who pay to gratify their vanity, to
the great detriment of old and experienced actors,
many of whom are starving. There are any number
of "Johnnies" who will take £10 worth of "stalls"
weekly in return for "walking on" and speaking a
few lines. Women also make similar arrangements
and contract to have a certain number of stalls to be
taken by their admirers so long as they are at the
theatre.
Bogus literary agents are usually Jews. They
advertise to the effect that they can place MSS. with
editors and publishers. They charge fees for reading
the MSS. submitted to them ranging from 2s 6d. to
£2 2s., and in this way reap a considerable income.
Should they have the luck to meet a fool with money
they persuade! him to publish his stuff in book-form,
needless to say, at his own expense. The agent saves
him all trouble and technical work in the matter and
incidentally fleeces him of large sums. In this manner
most of the inane books with which the world is
burdened see the light. Another dodge is to persuade
the dupes either to buy or invest money in some utterly
hopeless paper. The money that has been lost of late
years in periodicals started in this manner has been
fabulous. Yet the crop of ninnies never seems to fail.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,495 (1898-jun-05) p005
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
It is a common thing to read of the conviction of
some impostor for fraud by soliciting alms for some
non-existent charity. But directly the rogue blossoms
into affluence, rents a house, and terms it a "home"
of some description, the authorities become blind to
his impositions.
Judging from the gullibility of the public, we should
say that there is an immense field open to enterprising
landladies of boarding houses, who should invent some
high "faluting" title for their establishments and
appeal to the charitable public to supply them with
"funds" on the grounds that they keep their young
men lodgers indoors in the evening. Similar "charities"
appeal for funds on behalf of working boys'
homes, servants' homes, &c., which are run on
precisely similar lines.
Other organizations appeal to the public almost
solely for the purpose of paying their officials' salaries
and the expenses connected with printing and postage.
Take the trouble to study their reports few know,
by the way, how to dissect a balance-sheet
and you will find that the funds supplied by
the public to further some deserving cause
are swallowed up by salaries, office expenses,
printing, and posting! The overwhelming majority of
the persons who run these charities are ex-Dissenting
ministers, commercial failures, and neurotic cranks.
The missionary swindle to convert the heathen still
flourishes like a green bay tree in our midst, although
most men of the world who have travelled regard at
least one-half of the missionaries in uncivilized lands as
idle and immoral and Government officials state that
most of our "little" wars are caused by the meddlesomeness
and rapacity of these black-coated gentry.
Silly old women at home, however, Still provide these
impostors with about £2,000,000 per annum to enjoy
life on.
The time has surely come for a stringent inquiry
into the purposes and methods of all these begging
charities. Considering that £10,000,000 yearly is paid
for poor rates and as large a sum subscribed to various
Societies established to relieve some form of poverty or
other, it is obvious that gross maladministration
prevails. A thorough investigation, there is little doubt,
would lead to the conviction of some of their
promoters and secretaries as rogues and vagabonds and
cause the reorganization of many others.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,496 (1898-jun-12) p001
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
The general public have just been informed of some
of the nefarious practices of a number of so-called
"financial" journals by the statements of the fallen
millionaire, Hooley, who attributes his bankruptcy in
some degree to the blackmailing devices of these
periodicals. Many will be surprised at the lack of
commercial honesty prevailing in the City of London
when they find that the master of millions admits
coolly, and as a matter of course, that the rapacity of
these "financial" journals caused his ruin. To those,
however, in the "know" in city affairs, no astonishment,
save at the apathy of the authorities, will be
felt!
There are at the present moment numerous journals
of this class, some of which are ephemeral in their
existence, others continue for years. Very few enjoy
a bonâ-fide circulation of 100, yet their proprietors
continue to reap large incomes. They are run on the
following methods: It is an axiom in the City that so
shady is the character of most company promoters
there is scarcely one who would dare to ran the risk
of cross-examination. Brokers and promoters unite in
regarding each other as wolves and the outside public
as sheep to be shorn and devoured, This lamentable
state of things is the blackmailer's opportunity. Two
articles commenting on a company flotation are written
and set up. One lauds the enterprise to the skies, the
other gives particulars of a damning character relating
both to the prospects of the company and the past
history of its promoters and vendors. The proprietor,
armed with the two proofs, waits on the chief promoters
and demands any sum from £10 to
£10,000 for the
publication of the laudatory notice, under the threat of
publishing the other. The money is often paid. From
ten to twenty papers are thus "squared," and the
public in consequence are beguiled into investing in
bogus and dishonest concerns.
As a general rule less reliance can be placed upon the
advice of financial journals than upon the "tips" of
sporting "prophets." The "turf" has a bad name,
but it is conducted with greater honesty than the trade
of company promoting. Few are aware of the intense
difficulty there is in exposing a swindle through the
Press owing to the dead-set made by juries against
newspapers. The muzzling of the Press thus costs the
public many millions yearly. Some time ago the
writer was acquainted with a system of swindling,
which has since been exposed in a court of law, in
connection with certain hotels. A subsidiary company
was subsequently floated, which is now in
bankruptcy and the subject of an inquiry. Yet
not a single daily paper used the accurate facts he
supplied them with. One would at least think that,
after receiving such "copy," editors would direct
inquiries to be made before printing eulogistic articles
concerning the company in question, which every one
of them did! It is sad to think in connection with
British journalism that, with a few honourable exceptions,
a large advertisement prevents free comment
upon commercial matters. Take South African investments
for instance. Four years ago the Press boomed
£1 gold mine shares up to an average value of
£;11 11s.; to-day their holders would be glad to obtain
2s. 6d. each for them all round. The cycle "boom"
is another, and now we have Klondyke and its mines
advocated by almost every paper in the kingdom.
This is not this fault of newspaper editors, but of
proprietors, whose only object in running a newspaper is
to make money out of it. The editor receives all the
blame; it ought, rather, to be levelled at the head of
the proprietor.
|
|

from Reynolds's Newspaper,
No 2,498 (1898-jun-26) p002
|
|
THE MYSTERIES OF LONDON.
(SPECIAL TO "REYNOLDS'S")
For several years there has been in existence a gang
of swindlers who play upon the credulity and ignorance
of small capitalists frequently widows who have
perhaps a hundred or a hundred and fifty pounds, by
advertising "businesses" for sale and disposing, for
considerable sums, shops that are absolutely worthless.
They work on the following lines: They take shops in
a new neighbourhood and usually open them as
"generals," newsagents, sweet and tobacco shops, and
dairies. Grocers' shops with off licences and beerhouses
they greatly affect, as in these trades it is comparatively
easy to "fake" the returns. After shops of this
nature have been opened and a manager, who is in the
"swim," appointed, they are worked for a few weeks
and then advertised to be "sold at a sacrifice."
Inspection is invited, and, sooner or later, a purchaser
comes along and buys what he fondly imagines is a
nice little business with a steady turnover of from £25
to £35 a week for £120 or so.
There can be no doubt
as to the genuineness of the trade, the dupe argues,
for has he not inspected the weekly accounts, all
properly receipted, of the various wholesale firms
that supply the shops, when Messrs. Blank
have been paid about £8 weekly for groceries and
Brush and Co. £10 weekly for oilmen's requisites.
As soon, however, as the new tenant enters into
possession he finds, in some unaccountable way, that
the takings drop from £25 weekly to about £2 and
that he is not taking enough to pay his rent, much less
live! Should he complain of being defrauded he is
told that the trade has fallen oft owing to his lack of
business ability. In a few weeks the brokers are got
in and the purchaser goes out ruined.
This is is an every-day experience and it is managed
by the advertising business swindlers owning, generally,
a large and prosperous shop in some well-known
neighbourhood, the stock for which is purchased at the
worthless suburban shop, which is intended to be
disposed of and then transferred to the main establishment.
Of course the wholesale purveyors make out
their account to the suburban shop, which are shown
to a would-be purchaser as a proof of the bonâ-fides of
the business.
Beerhouses are sold on the strength of doing so many
barrels monthly, and the brewer's receipts are
produced in evidence. In nine cases out of ten, however,
the trade is a bogus one. Intending purchasers of
small shops should always insist upon having them on
trial for a fortnight before parting with their money.
If the business is of a bonâ-fide nature and the
intending purchaser a respectable person, no opposition will
be offered by the vendor, while, if he refuses, the business
he wishes to dispose of may be avoided as fraudulent.
(THE END)
|
|