My Methods of Writing
Noted Humorist, Author of "Hollywood" and Many Other
Stories, Gives Advice to Young Authors
By Frank Condon
(1882-1940)
JIM
TULLY, who is red-headed, and
serious-minded, and who, himself,
can undoubtedly write better short
stories than I can, has, at the request of
the Story World, asked me for a brief
article, demonstrating in my own way
the methods I employ in writing, and how
the material is obtained. There is a
certain smack of irony in this request,
because Jim knows very well how material
for a short story, or a long story, or a
medium height story, or any other kind
of story is clawed out of the surrounding
ether with sweatings and groanings and
cursings, too, unless one is a Methodist.
I can see the sardonic gleam in Jim's
eye and hear him say to himself, in a low
tone, "Now, let's see what this bozo has
got to say for himself."
However, I shall not be stumped. The
correct method of obtaining a short
story, is, briefly, as follows: You
imagine yourself to be an author, which
is not difficult which is, in fact, easy
and universal and you are seated in a
deck chair on a Coney Island Iron Steamboat,
riding to Coney Island of a summer
afternoon; and upon glancing up casually,
you observe a stranger, a tall, serious
man about thirty-five, standing near the
taffrail. At this point, you pause and
look in a good dictionary to see what a
taffrail is. The man, you assume, from
his gloomy bearing, is about to commit
suicide by leaping into the sea, and you
know he is suffering from alcoholic
melancholia. You determine to interfere and
to save a human life. As you arise, you
turn in your seat and behold a strikingly
handsome woman, about twenty-seven,
idling, in a suspicious manner, near the
forward binnacle, and you pause again
to discover if a binnacle is precisely
what you think it is.
Now, you have your two main
characters, and, in the slang of the day, you
are "sitting pretty." You rush hastily
aft, determined to save this man from a
rash deed. You approach him mind,
you are imagining all this and notice at
once, the tremulous quavering of his
mouth, and the sure mark of the drinker.
You say, cheerily, "Hello, Joe."
Of course, he doesn't know you, and
his name isn't Joe, but you plunge
onward, talking cheerfully, pretending that
the wild party, at which you and he met,
(mythical, of course) certainly turned out
to be a whizzer. You tell him that you
deeply regretted the impromptu marriage
https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/random-pen-sketch-sribbles-set_9105937.htm
that took place on the back porch, and
actually tried to stop it, until overcome
by intoxicated ruffians. Joe asks you
what marriage, his memory being a
blank, and you are surprised that he
cannot recall his own midnight wedding,
especially considering the pure and
youthful beauty of the girl.
You have judged the stranger right.
He remembers nothing, and asks you in
a trembling voice if the lady was
"pickled" also. You say she certainly
was. Already, his notion of leaping
overboard is beginning to dissolve, thrust
from his mind by this more serious matter.
You then point to the beautiful
woman, leaning over the forward rail and
say to Joe mournfullly, "There's your
bride. And she is so unhappy over the
whole thing that she's going to commit
suicide."
Joe immediately rushes forward, and
throws his arms about the woman, who,
of course, is a stranger to him and is
vastly astonished, her confusion being
only increased by Joe's beseeching her
not to jump.
At this point, you, as an author, reach
what we call the delicate nuances of the
tale. The lady is a stranger. Joe is a
stranger. You are a stranger. Nobody
knows what is going to happen, and this
ignorance of future events is termed
suspense. The curious and remarkable thing
about the situation is and you have been
working steadily toward it that the
lady is a despondent Brooklyn telephone
girl, who was going to commit suicide
that very morning because her mother
refused to let her have her hair bobbed.
Joe, of course, saves her life. You have
saved Joe's life.
You are now almost at the apex or
conclusion of the effort. This conclusion
may be arrived at in one of several ways.
Help yourself. Bob Davis or Charlie
MacLean or Ray Long or George Lorimer
or Jimmy Quirk or Karl Harriman
will probably write you a short, pointed
letter, indicating that while they have
known for a long time that your mind
was pulling out of the socket, the possibility
of keeping it from the public is
growing less every day.
This is the way I have obtained all my
yarns, and anyone who is diligent and
serious-minded can do the same. Jim
says to put in a few bits about my early
struggles, but I can recall little of these
early struggles, except the great trouble
of getting checks in advance of the actual
writing from Robert H. Davis, a much
unappreciated man. These struggles
were unquestionably early, beginning
some weeks on Monday, about ten in the
morning.
There is still another way of securing
short story material. You sit in a merry
party with the guests, until the brightest
mind present narrates a vivid thing that
happened to him and his girl, Ella Smith,
last Saturday afternoon, while they were
driving between New Haven and Springfield
in a four-passenger car with wire
wheels. It interests you immensely. You
gloat over it. You sneak home, determined
to write the incident, smearing it
over with artistic decorations, and in
your own characteristic style, giving it
the deft touches you have learned from
study and observation. You do so with
glee, and sell it to a prominent magazine,
and two months later, you are sued for
theft, and are publicly branded as a low
plagiarist of the grossest sort, the story
having appeared in 1914, in the "Red
Lantern Magazine" under the title,
"Archways of Fate."
I have now exceeded my word quota.
If there is anything I have omitted about
the art of writing the short story, I will
gladly communicate with inquirers who
have the thoughtfulness to enclose a
two-dollar bill.
(THE END)