The Muse of the Locked Door
By Elsie McCormick
[Elsie McCormick Dunn]
(1894-1962)
COLTRANE still maintains that
he acted rightly in the matter.
I have long since ceased arguing
with him, partly because it
is useless and partly because, after
reading her latest poems, I am beginning
to agree that Laura Lent's happiness
is worth less to the world than
her work.
I was with Coltrane the first time he
received a manuscript from her. He
opened it in his usual bored way,
polished his glasses and read it through.
But instead of reaching toward the
pigeon-hole marked "Regret Slips," he
went over again slowly and thoughtfully,
with the expression of a man
who has unexpectedly picked up ten
dollars.
"Read it, Moulton," he ordered,
thrusting it at me. It consisted of four
short poems written on both sides of
the paper in a queer feminine hand.
But after I had read them I was as surprised
as Coltrane. There was something
unearthly about them something,
as a sentimental reader later remarked,
"that savored of the stardust."
Down at the bottom of the page
was the name "Laura E. Lent," and a
post-office box in a small Western
town.
"Where, this side of the Styx, does
that woman get her aloof viewpoint?"
demanded Coltrane when I put down
the manuscript. "She writes like some
kind of angel that has put in a few
thousand years ministering to humanity."
Coltrane wrote verse himself
once.
"Maybe it's a nun writing under an
assumed name," I suggested.
"No," answered the editor, tapping
the manuscript thoughtfully with his
glasses. "She's reached peace through
suffering, not by digging it up in a
cloister. She might be a hopeless invalid,
tied down to one room, or maybe
she's a rancher's wife, living thirty
miles from the nearest railroad. Anyway,
she's out of the world so far that
she's gotten an entirely new angle on
it."
"Ever heard the name before?" I inquired.
"Never," he answered, "and I don't
think any other editor did. She violates
every possible rule about submitting
a manuscript. I came near
putting it in the waste-basket without
going any farther than the heading."
Coltrane ran the poems in the next
number of the magazine. The issue
had not been on the newsstands a day
before he began to receive comments
on them. Then the reviews took them
up, and after they had been reprinted
four or five times, the new writer was
on the way to become famous.
But of all the people who had
watched her success, Laura E. Lent
was apparently the least interested.
She ignored Coltrane's letter of appreciation,
and her only answer to the
check was another manuscript, more
beautiful and more poorly written than
the first one.
"She's a mystery, that woman," remarked
Coltrane, a couple of months
later. "I've never yet succeeded in
getting a personal word out of her.
This month I purposely withheld the
check, just to see what she'd do about
it. That usually brings them to earth.
A person may write like an angel, but
if he doesn't get his pay on time, the
letter he sends to the editor sounds
like the correspondence of a ward-boss
who was cheated out of his graft. But
not Laura E. Lent. She merely sent
in a finger-marked manuscript that was
enough to make Keats shut up shop.
That woman has reached a stage of
evolution where money means nothing
to her."
Coltrane sat down at his desk and
absent-mindedly sorted his papers. "I
will send for her to come East," he
remarked. "The magazine can afford to
put up the fare if it can get a woman
like that on its staff. At least we'll
find out whether Laura is a self-appointed
hermit or the long-suffering
wife of an invalid husband."
When I dropped in at the office a
few days later, I found Coltrane musing
over a letter. "I heard from Laura
E. Lent," he remarked, with a peculiar
twinkle in his eye. Without further
comment he handed me a letter written
in indelible pencil on cheap tablet
paper. It was undated and without
a heading.
"I received your invitation to come
East," it read, "and no one knows how
much I would like to accept it. To see
the open fields again, to meet clever
men and women, to be part of the whirl
of city life, would mean more to me
than anything else on earth. Since
receiving your letter I have lived
through the trip a hundred times. But
I cannot come now or ever. I am doing
life in the State penitentiary."
"That accounts for the sad remoteness
we've been trying to analyze,"
Coltrane remarked. "When I go West
next week I'm going to call on the Governor
of her State and see what can be
done for her. The judge who sent that
woman to prison committed a crime
against American literature."
Coltrane left to spend his bi-annual
vacation with Jack Avery, his star
contributor. A week or two later I
received one of his abrupt letters. "I've
seen her," he wrote. "She's tall and
white, with eyes that don't belong to
this planet. She reminds me of a woman
who has died and left only her
ghost. I talked to her in the presence
of an iron-faced matron who interrupted
the conversation and said 'You
was' and 'He ain't.' She's been sent
up for murder, it seems killed a man
who had won her under promise of
marriage and failed to make good, as
that type usually fail. Think of a
woman writing poetry in an atmosphere
reeking of chloride de lime!"
"The Governor is a nice chap," he
wrote a short time afterward. "It's
fear of his political skin which prevents
him from granting a pardon. The
judge who sentenced her rides in the
political band wagon, and controls
enough ballots to paper the capitol. So
many of his opponents criticised his
judgment in this case that he would
consider a pardon a personal affront.
The most the Governor can do is to use
his influence with the parole board.
Her petition will be read at the next
meeting."
Coltrane stayed in the West until the
prison doors closed behind Laura E.
Lent. The poet was silent for a few
months, probably while she was becoming
adjusted to the world she had
been forced to renounce. Then she began
to write. The first manuscript
caused Coltrane to lose his appetite for
lunch. The second ruined his disposition
for the rest of the week. The
third made him decide on a hurried
trip to the West.
"Read it!" he roared, handing me
the neat type-written copy. "Did you
ever see such drivel? It's the kind of
stuff you'd expect from a fat, middle-aged
woman who belongs to the Monday
Morning Literary Club!" It was.
Laura E. Lent, of the beautiful conceits
and strange intuitions, was gone.
The poem included a rhapsody over an
impassioned kiss, a lot of second-rate
moralizing over love and several
references to summer moonlight. It was
cheap, banal and as uninspired as a
turnip.
Coltrane's first letter after his
departure confirmed my worst suspicions.
"She's getting fat and red-faced," he
wrote. "She has all the poses of a
third carbon authoress. I believe she
sells her autograph. She's almost as
spiritual as a Swedish cook. Why in
Heaven's name does a woman lose her
soul as soon as she ceases to suffer?"
As I didn't hear from Coltrane again
I came to the conclusion that his
disappointment was too deep for mere pen
and paper. But when he returned, I
was surprised to find him as happy
as when he had received Laura E.
Lent's first manuscript.
"Any news about Laura E. Lent?" I
inquired, when I met him at the station.
"Oh, she's in good hands," he remarked
pleasantly. "She was seized
by some requisition officers for crossing
the State line. I had the Averys
invite her to visit them for a few
weeks. They lived over the boundary."
"But didn't she understand that a
person on parole can't leave the
State?" I demanded.
"Maybe she didn't understand that
she was leaving the State," answered
Coltrane. "Boundaries aren't material
black lines, you know."
"But it means that she'll go back to
prison for life," I exclaimed, aghast
at his stupidity. "There'll be no possible
chance of getting pardon or another
parole now. And you let her
break her parole without warning her.
Good Heavens, man! What have you
done?"
"Done?" queried Coltrane, lighting
a cigar. "Merely given America the
best poet she'll have between Edgar
Allen Poe and Kingdom Come!"