THE TRAGIC END OF GUY
DE MAUPASSANT
By Albert Schinz
(1870-1943)
EVER
since the shocking end of Maupassant in 1893, at the age
of forty-three, after eighteen months spent in an insane asylum,
the world has been anxious to know more about the causes of his
fatal malady and premature death.
For some years it was difficult to lift the veil. The mother of the
dead, absorbed in her grief, was still alive, and, while always glad to
talk about the fame and the writings of her son, she avoided as much
as possible the discussion of the final tragedy. For her sake, those who
knew and were in a position to speak remained silent. But in December,
1903, she followed her son to the grave, and since that time
scholars and critics have been busy unravelling the terrible Maupassant
mystery.
Recently the results of these investigations have come out, and as
far as the story of the late illness and death is concerned, we know now
probably all that we shall ever know. The facts are of such a character
as to convince those of us who perhaps still doubted it, that life can be
more dramatic than fiction.
❦
Thanks to Flaubert, who did not allow his pupil to spoil his literary
talent before maturity, Maupassant was over thirty years of age before
he gave up his modest position in the bureaux of the government, in
Paris, in order to devote himself entirely to literature. One day,
unexpectedly, he had surprised the world and at once conquered fame
with a little masterpiece, "Boule de Suif." The story had been published
in the "Soirées de Médan," a collective book of Zola and some younger
naturalists. Then followed, for the young author, a period of ten
years of the most intense production. At first Maupassant, who did
not possess a very imaginative mind, drew for his stories from his
former experiences in life from the time of his boyhood in Normandy,
where he had become well acquainted with those fishermen and peasants
whom he depicted so perfectly; from scenes witnessed during the
Franco-Prussian War, when he served as a soldier; and from his Parisian
life, when he was in daily contact with the world of clerks and small
employees, and also enjoyed life as a young athlete, being especially
fond of rowing. But he would not forever be satisfied with what he
had already seen; he wanted to see life under other aspects, and one
which had remained closed to him up to that time attracted him
particularly, namely, society. A good writer is always welcome in
Parisian salons; Maupassant was not only well received, but his company
was eagerly sought. There can be no doubt that he went there
especially with a view to finding new characters for his stories, yet it
cannot be denied that he yielded also to the seductions that the life of
the rich can offer. He himself had become comparatively wealthy,
thanks to his publications, and he could afford a good deal of luxury.
But he tried to keep in mind constantly the danger of being absorbed
by worldly pleasures, and so he made it a point not to take permanent
abode in Paris, as do most writers. He went often to the seashore,
to Etretat in Normandy, or to Houlgate, during the summer, to the
Riviera during the winter, besides travelling extensively. All in all,
taking into account the time devoted to society, and the amount of
writing he was doing, Maupassant was leading a very strenuous life;
he thought he could do this with impunity, owing to the exceptionally
robust health he had enjoyed during the first thirty years of his life.
❦
In the last days of September, 1891, however, he established himself
at Cannes for the whole winter, because for some time he had not
felt well and strong; but very few suspected that a catastrophe was so
near. His mother, who was then living at Nice, and whom he visited
almost daily, noticed in the first days of December some alarming
symptoms of nervousness in him, but even she did not understand the
seriousness of the case. The one who knew best that something was
very wrong with Maupassant was his devoted valet, François (who is
now a waiter in the Hôtel Terminus, of the Gare Saint Lazare, in
Paris). A few days before Christmas he had been awakened one night
by reports of a pistol. On entering the room, he found Maupassant
shooting in the night, and by way of explanation he declared that he had
heard some one scaling the wall of the garden below. The next morning
François, rendered suspicious and uneasy by this odd performance,
secretly removed the balls from the cartridges and replaced the weapon
in the drawer where he had found it.
Maupassant had promised his mother that he would spend Christmas
eve with her; but in the morning she received a telegram which read
thus: "Obligé de réveillonner aux îles Sainte Marguerite avec Mmes
* * * mais je viendrai finir l'année et passer mon jour de l'an avec toi"
("Forced to celebrate Christmas eve at Sainte Marguerite, with Mmes.
* * * but will come and spend New Year's eve and New Year's day
with you"). Signed: Guy.
When New Year's eve came, he did not go, however, and even on
the first of January he would have stayed at home had it not been for
François, who, seeing him very much depressed, succeeded in cheering
him up and persuading him to drive with him to Nice. Guy arrived
there in the afternoon. In the course of the dinner, he suddenly began
to talk incoherently; at one time he said that by a pill which he had
swallowed he had been informed of an event that was of great
importance to him. Seeing his mother's dismayed look, he realized
the absurdity of his words and by a strong effort succeeded in recovering
his countenance. But the meal ended in an embarrassed and mournful
silence. As soon as it was over, Maupassant ordered his carriage. His
mother, filled with anxious forebodings, entreated him to stay and
spend the night at her house; but in vain. She was never to see him
again, either alive or dead. She was herself in a rather poor condition
of health, which induced her family and her friends to conceal the truth
until some time after all was over.
❦
When he reached his house, in Cannes, Maupassant said that he
felt tired, and went to his bedroom. François, who had received orders
to watch him closely, begged to be allowed to remain near
him overnight; but the permission was not granted.
Thus nobody witnessed the scene that immediately followed, but we
can reconstruct it easily from what we know of the circumstances before
and after. Several times, previous to this crisis, Maupassant had had
moments of despondency and had more than once discussed with friends
the question of insanity. Dr. Frémy has told how, only a few months
before the events here related, he had said to him: "Do you not believe
that I shall end by becoming mad? If such were the case, my dear,
you ought to tell me. There is no hesitation possible between madness
and death. My choice is made beforehand." Others who knew him
well have testified to having heard similar remarks from him. Now,
on that fatal afternoon of the first of January, 1892, he had realized
plainly that he was no longer able to control his mind, even in the
presence of others. He therefore decided that the time had come to
make good his pledge. He tried his revolver, but without success, since
the balls had been removed. Then, fearing, probably, lest his will
power might soon leave him, he seized the first weapon within reach,
which happened to be a paper-knife lying on the table, and made an
attempt to cut his throat. But the instrument was not sharp enough,
and only made a bad wound, which bled abundantly. It must be known
that ever since Maupassant had suffered from his nerves, he had lived
in a superstitious terror of all physical pain, and anything that reminded
him of it, especially blood. Thus, the nervous shock was such that he
suddenly began to shriek madly. François came rushing in the room,
and a desperate struggle followed, in which he tried in vain to disarm
his master. A fit of wild madness had set in, and it was only by the
herculean strength of one of the sailors of Maupassant's yacht, who
had come to the rescue, that they succeeded in getting control of the
patient until the doctor arrived.
A few days later Maupassant was taken to Paris, and confined in
the asylum of the famous Dr. Blanche, where he remained for eighteen
months. Here he died on July sixth of the following year.
The details concerning his confinement are heart-breaking. Many
of them have appeared in print. This sort of publication seems to us
to be most undesirable, both from the standpoint of ethics and from
the standpoint of good taste. Therefore we omit them here altogether.
Let us, however, recall a touching scene that took place in Cannes
shortly before he was conveyed by train to Paris. He dearly loved his
yacht Bel-Ami, bought with the money earned in selling his novel of
the same name. His friends, secretly hoping that the sight of the
boat might bring back to him once more his own mind, took him down
to the harbor. "With his arms restrained in a strait-jacket, the
unfortunate man was taken to the shore. Bel-Ami rocked lightly on
the sea. . . . The blue sky, the balmy air, the well built lines of his
beloved boat, all seemed to calm him. His aspect became gentle. . . .
He looked for a long while at his ship, with an expression both
melancholy and tender. . . . He moved his lips, but no sound left his
mouth. While he was being taken away, he turned round several times
to look again at Bel-Ami. Those who were with Guy all had tears in
their eyes. And it was with tears in his eyes that a faithful friend,
Joseph Primoli, told me that harrowing anecdote of the latest illness of
his Maupassant." (Souvenirs sur Maupassant, Albert Lumbroso.)
❦
Friends, physicians, scholars, have expressed varied opinions regarding
the probable origin of Maupassant's insanity. The most recent
investigations have convinced us that it would be wrong, probably, to
account for it by a single cause, but that, on the contrary, several causes
worked together towards the same fatal end.
First of all, it would be difficult to deny that there were hereditary
predispositions in Maupassant. Some extraordinary stories are related
of Maupassant's ancestors on the maternal side, the Le Poittevin, a
family from Normandy. Here is one attributed to Guy's grandfather.
Near the town of Valognes is situated the feudal domain of Gonneville,
an old medieval castle with a haunted room. There appears to
those who sleep in this room, so runs the legend, a black sheep. So
keen was the terror inspired by this haunted chamber that the most
miserable of vagabonds preferred, rather than to sleep there, to take
his night's rest on the stones of the roadside. M. Le Poittevin slept in
this room, and the black sheep appeared to him, saying: "As long as
you and your descendants preserve this domain, good fortune will
remain with you." The young man bought the property of Gonneville
as soon as he had gained a fairly good fortune in business in the
neighborhood of Rouen.
Here is one concerning Guy's own mother. She had just been
married to M. de Maupassant. They were on their wedding trip. In
visiting a church at Heidelberg she suddenly found herself alone, her
husband having gone on under the guidance of the beadle. She
approached a confessional, and, lifting the curtain which hung over the
grating, perceived the face of a monk a livid face, fixing sightless eyes
upon her. She drew back terrified. Was it real or an illusion? Fear
of insanity seized her. In the meantime the loquacious beadle was
pointing out the sculpturing of the confessional; he put his hand on the
door, and Mme. de Maupassant thought that if the confessional proved
empty, if she had been the sport of a delusion, she should go mad.
The door opened, and she saw, in monk's clothing, a waxen face from
which time had faded the colors, giving it the appearance of a corpse.
❦
Those who remember Maupassant's weird stories, like "Le Horla,"
"Lui," "Apparition," or his book "Sur l'eau," will recognize at once
in them the reflection of the same turn of mind which appears in
the anecdotes just related, a fact which is all the more striking in a
writer who had shown such strong realistic tendencies in his artistic
creed before the time when his health began to decline.
Other very grave symptoms both in Maupassant himself and his
mother have been described by physicians; but it would be out of place
to mention them here. Only one more thing may be said with regard
to this question. Guy had a brother, Hervé, who died a few years
before him of exactly the same disease (general paralysis); but this was
in consequence of a sunstroke. It would seem rather difficult to
attribute to mere chance the fact that these two brothers should have
been affected exactly in the same way insanity from causes so
different. Their systems must have been predisposed that way.
But there are many reasons to believe that Maupassant might have
escaped insanity, had it not been for his strenuous life. His mother was
affected in the same way, but the external circumstances that brought
about actual madness in her son were avoided in her case. With his
brother, insanity was the result of an accident. We have pointed
out before that Guy, as a young man, was unusually strong; and, being
of an extremely active temperament, he scorned all advices from friends
or physicians, not to overwork himself. When he came to Paris his
fondness for rowing had made him adopt a régime which, as a doctor
has it, "would have been too much for a young athlete at Oxford or
Cambridge." But, besides rowing, he worked in his office every day,
and he began to write verses and stories. And later, when he gave up
rowing, he went into society life, which, as physicians tell us, is particularly
trying for the nerves when one has not known it before thirty.
Moreover, his literary production at that time was amazing. By and
by he made another mistake in taking strong stimulants, such as cocaine,
morphine, and especially ether. All this combined was bound to react
within comparatively few years upon a constitution predisposed to
mental trouble. The physical sufferings were gradually accompanied
by fits of melancholy, strange freaks of imagination, regular hallucinations.
Maupassant had exactly the same experiences as those related in
some of Poe's stories, or in Musset's poetry, especially in the latter's
"Nuit de Décembre." One night, among others, we are told that while
sitting at his table and writing, Maupassant thought that he heard some
one opening the door; he turned around and was confronted with his own
person entering the room, walking towards the table, then sitting down
in front of him, and proceeding to dictate his work.
Instead of trying to avoid further experiences of the kind, Maupassant
only plunged deeper into that dangerous atmosphere by making
use of his disorders of the brain for his stories. With his antecedents,
it would have been a miracle if insanity had been avoided.
❦
And yet, as if all this was not enough, another cause still remains
to be indicated which was also working in the same direction. It must
be acknowledged that we have no direct information concerning the
special circumstances here; but from indirect sources we are led to
infer that the actual determining cause which hastened the final crisis
is due to a woman, to one of those egoistic, wicked creatures of the
so-called "weaker" sex, who know so well how to torture a man who
has once yielded to their devilish charms.
The odd and mysterious way in which Maupassant acted in the
week previous to the breaking out of his insanity has already been told.
After having promised his mother to be with her on Christmas eve, he
telegraphed on the morning of that day that he was "forced" to be
elsewhere, namely, at Saint Marguerite. There lived two ladies, sisters,
one of whom was the heroine of Maupassant's novel "Une Vie." Nobody
except the two women seems to have seen him in those days; they
apparently monopolized him; not only did he visit them, but there are
some indications that they went to his house also. What fatal tragedy
took place finally at the îles Sainte Marguerite? What did the two
dames du grand monde do with him, the man broken in health, unable
to resist their wicked spell? God knows; no man has ever probed the
depths of female cruelty. Our only information is this: As far as the
two ladies are concerned, we are told that they left for Paris suddenly,
the day after the fatal réveillon, with the first train in the morning;
and although they were personally acquainted with Mme. de Maupassant,
she never saw or heard anything from them since, even after Guy's
death.
As to Maupassant, on seeing his mother on the first day of January,
he behaved like a man who was mad with grief but could not tell even
his mother what the cause of it was. His superhuman efforts to control
himself can be read, it seems, even between the lines of those words of
Madame de Maupassant: "Upon arriving, Guy, whose eyes were filled
with tears, kissed me with extraordinary effusion. All the afternoon
we chatted upon a thousand subjects; I noticed in him nothing abnormal
except a certain exaltation. It was not until later, at table, in the
midst of our dinner, which we ate alone together, that I perceived that
his mind was wandering."
And this is all we know. And we still remain asking, Why? Those
causes heredity, overwork, cruelty of a woman may satisfy the
scholar, historian, psychologist, physician, but they do not satisfy us
as merely human beings, who have not only to study life, but to live it.
We remain pondering why the representative of a higher humankind
should not be spared that most horrid fate, to have his body survive
his mind? It would seem that one of the noblest aims of life would
be to rise above the level not only of the animal, but of the average
humanity, which is low enough and yet, the Power that is above all
human power deemed it fit to throw back, to the disgusting condition
of a mere brute, just that one who had achieved with particular success
the difficult and noble end! Why?